Foward Deployed Engineering
Published on: 16 September 2025
Tags: #fde #go-to-market #strategy #saas
The FDE Model vs. Traditional SaaS
graph TD;
subgraph "FDE Model (Problem-First)"
direction TB
A["Identify a High-Value
Problem Area"] --> B{"Partner with an Early Customer"};
B --> C["FDEs Build Custom Solution On-site"];
C --> D["Learn & Gather Insights"];
D --> E["Generalize Solution into a
Scalable Product"];
E --> F["Expand to Similar Customers"];
end
subgraph "Traditional SaaS Model (Solution-First)"
direction TB
G["Define a Scalable
Product First"] --> H{"Find Customers with that
Exact Problem"};
H --> I["Sell & Onboard"];
I --> J["Scale Sales & Marketing"];
end
%% Styling to emphasize key differences
style A fill:#d2ffd2,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
style G fill:#cde4ff,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
style E font-weight:bold
style F font-style:italic
style J font-style:italic
The FDE "Unscalable at Scale" Loop
graph TD;
subgraph "On-Site (Field)"
direction TB
A(Customer N);
B["FDE Team Deploys
(High-touch custom work)"];
C{Solves Specific Problem};
A --> B --> C;
end
subgraph "At HQ (Core)"
direction TB
E[Core Product & Eng Team];
F["Generalize & Improve the Platform"];
E --> F;
end
C -- "Insights & Learnings" --> E;
F -- "Improved Product (More Leverage)" --> B;
%% Styling to highlight the key parts of the loop
style F fill:#d2ffd2,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px;
style B fill:#cde4ff,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px;
Information Flow: The Learning Company
graph TD;
subgraph Customer Site
direction TB
A(Customer Needs & Problems);
B(FDE Team);
A --> B;
end
subgraph Company HQ
direction TB
C(Product Team);
D(Engineering Team);
end
B -- "Real-time Feedback & Product Gaps" --> C;
C -- "Generalized Requirements & Vision" --> D;
D -- "New Product Features & Leverage" --> B;
style B fill:#d2ffd2
style C fill:#cde4ff
The "Consulting Firm Trap"
graph TD;
subgraph Ideal FDE Path
direction TB
A[Customer A Needs] --> B(FDE Builds Solution A);
B --> C{Generalize Learnings};
C --> D[Improve Core Platform];
D --> E[Serve Customer B Faster/Cheaper];
end
subgraph "The Consulting Trap (Failure Path)"
direction TB
F[Customer A Needs] --> G(FDE Builds Solution A);
H[Customer B Needs] --> I(FDE Builds Solution B);
I --> J[Customer C Needs];
J --> K(FDE Builds Solution C);
G --> H;
H --> J;
J --> L(...);
L --> M[No Scalable Product - Just Services];
end
style M fill:#ffcccc,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
style D fill:#d2ffd2
The Cultural Divide: Field vs. HQ
graph LR;
subgraph "Field (FDE Team)"
direction LR
A("Priority:
Customer Success (Now!)");
B("Incentive:
Solve the immediate problem, whatever it takes.");
C("View of HQ:
'They're too slow and don't understand the real world.'");
A --> B --> C;
end
subgraph "HQ (Core Product Team)"
direction LR
D("Priority:
Scalability & Maintainability");
E("Incentive:
Generalize solutions to serve many customers.");
F("View of Field:
'They're building messy hacks and creating tech debt.'");
D --> E --> F;
end
A -- "Requests for
Urgent, Custom Features" --> F;
D -- "Pushback on
One-Off Solutions" --> C;
style A fill:#f9f,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
style D fill:#9cf,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
Financial Risk: The Trough of Sorrow
gantt
%% Subtitle
dateFormat X
axisFormat %s
section Traditional SaaS
Initial Burn :a1, 0, 3s
Breakeven :a2, after a1, 2s
Steady Growth :a3, after a2, 8s
section FDE Model
Deep Burn (Customer 1) :crit, b1, 0, 6s
Continued Burn (Customer 2+) :b2, after b1, 4s
Potential Breakeven :b3, after b2, 3s
High Growth (If successful) :b4, after b3, 5s